IMAGE: COSMOPOLITAN.COM
Make no mistake, the majority of our forum members are yearning for change. “Zzzzzz …. NEXT!” proclaimed DutchHomme right away.
“Sex and Madonna are two things I would never want to associate with one another,” noted a disgusted GivenchyHomme.
GlamorousBoy echoed similar uninterested thoughts, writing, “Awful and boring… everything.” Nail on the head, we say.
Additionally projecting the same idea was Nymphaea: “Can’t she do anything else? For years she hasn’t had any interesting pics. Move on!”
“The plain backgrounds are their signature so to go away with it, for me, loses the identity of the magazine. This is a step toward the wrong direction. It looks like a fan wanted a cover for her but couldn’t find the exact Cosmo fonts and a shot of her on a plain background, thus the result,” MON discredited.
But not everyone was left wanting something different. “It’s a well tested formula for Madonna to be presented like this, at this point in her career. It’s so very interesting that not even Cosmo could break away with that. Shows how much power she has. On the other hand, I do like that 25 years later, she is back on the cover, true Icon!” admired Miss Dalloway.
“All great shots, nothing too original, but still great,” enthused justaguy.
Are you a fan? Join the conversation inside the thread here.
