IMAGE: HARPERSBAZAAR.ES
It’s only natural for one cover to outshine the other but which is favored by our forum members? “I like the idea and pose of the first cover but the styling is terrible imo. No words for the second cover, so awful. The photoshopped background, the lame ‘model 101’ pose, the jacket with the bikini…” discredited kokobombon.
“You’re right! Idk why fashion magazines are always trying to style a bikini? As if any woman would ever hit the beach like that!” replied A.D.C. not feeling the styling.
“What a disappointment after two stellar covers. Nagi Sakai is a tremendous photographer who is quite consistent with his work for other HB editions, but Constance just isn’t a versatile model. Beautiful, but she’s got zero range. To zoom into her face for a beauty shot is the best you can get from her,” Benn98 criticized, slamming Constance’s modeling abilities.
Creative shared the same sentiments. “Terrible. I had high hopes for this magazine, but it has been a complete disappointment,” he wrote.
Gossiping had a dramatic difference of opinion, however: “Constance is absolutely stunning. To me, one of the most beautiful women in the world!”
“It’s nice to see Constance on the cover again. These covers are perfect for summer,” appreciated narcyza.
Take a peek at the accompanying cover story and drop us a comment here.
